Mein Gott, things just get worse and worse.
In compliance with EU regulators, Microsoft proposed a browser ballot screen (pushed through Windows Update to XP, Vista, and Win7), allowing users to choose which browser they want to install. This is one of the closest things Windows has to a mainstream program chooser program (Google Pack is kinda’ close, but not quite the same thing). It’s not perfect, but Microsoft is definitely moving towards something that’s fair, maintainable, and easy to use.

Microsoft's Browser Ballot Proposal
The official document outlining this ballot can be found here (DOC file). Here are some highlights for you:
- Windows Internet Explorer Bundling
- OEMs have the right to turn on or off Internet Explorer and install their own browsers, without any retaliation from Microsoft or “special agreements” (i.e. money to favor IE).
- Microsoft will still be able to update certain components of IE (e.g. security, Trident renderer), but IE (e.g. the browser frame, menus) will not get pushed.
- The Ballot Screen
- Pushed through Windows Update as a high-priority update for both WinXP and Vista.
- Automatically included in Win7, if everyone can agree on time. Otherwise, through Windows Update. Every Windows after Win7 will have have it automatically included.
- Takes the most recent versions of the top 10 browsers with more than 0.5% market share. That’s effectively IE8, Firefox 3, Safari 4, Chrome 2, and Opera 9.
- Each browser shown horizontally will feature a small descriptive blurb, an install link, and an info link. Links go to vendors’ pages.
- Microsoft will not allow download links of browsers that are bundled with things like toolbars and other piggybackware. Defunct browsers or Trident-dependent are also not supported (no lolifox, no Maxthon).
- Microsoft won’t design it so that it’ll favor any one browser over another (applies to all vendors).
- IT shops can still disable the ballot screen if they think it’s a pain in the ass.
Now, this is where all the nitpicking comes in.
You Go To The Opera To See Drama and Hear People Scream At Each Other Sing Really Loudly
Microsoft gave people an inch (actually, much more than inch compared to other OSes), and Opera demands a mile. While generally happy with the unprecedented proposal, they still had complaints. They’re chief complaint?
IE’s logo against their’s.
For Pete’s sake, you saying that someone’s logo is too ubiquitous with the Internet? Maybe it’s because people are visual learners, don’t care about text, and look for something pretty. You have to admit, the IE logo isn’t too shabby, but if your logo (with name) doesn’t cut it, who’s fault is that? Companies spend millions of dollars into logos and brand images, equity that is very real on someone’s balance sheet.
The logo isn’t a business tactic. It’s actually part of the business.
And, I don’t know about you, but Opera’s red logo
is rather striking compared to IE’s blue logo
. Red has always been a stronger color. That said, IE’s is just plain prettier. If Opera’s logo isn’t cutting it, the onus is on Opera to revamp their logo, not IE. If you ask me, it could use something to make it look fuller.
“We’re not sure of logos. The blue ‘e’ has become so associated with the Internet in general, due to the bundling with Windows. We think using the blue ‘e’ might not be such a good idea.”
To me, it sounds more like,
“We’re not sure of logos. The blue ‘e’ looks more like a blue globe called the Earth in general, due to the bundling with the highly graphical Windows OS. Because it looks better than our red ‘O’, we think using the blue ‘e’ might make people choose the prettier option.”
Congratulations, you’ve discovered the core of the problem: stupid users distracted by shiny pretty things. Opera and the EU obviously don’t think people should become computer literate, they just want you to never choose Microsoft have a choice in what you run.
Chrome released, Mozilla frowns. Polls show Mozilla not in first place, Mozilla frowns. I’m hungry, Mozilla frowns.
Mozilla decides that Microsoft is still not doing enough. Or rather, they haven’t bothered to do any research or care about its users, potential and otherwise.
In the Mozilla VP’s blog, Harvey Anderson writes, “Not offering updates through Windows Update to an off-switched IE is a good start. But most users won’t have IE turned off, even if they have other browsers as their default.”
So, is he saying that he’d rather have an unpatched Internet Explorer running around? I tend to enter my house through the garage door rather than the front door; it’s just easier considering my routine. If I forget to lock my front door, does that mean it should never get locked if my (non-existent in real life) housekeeper finds it unlocked? Or if the lock is broken?
I mean, I can just not have a door there. But if I want to use that door, I should be able to, yes?
In less metaphorical terms, hell yes I want Microsoft to update my IE. I barely ever use that browser. However, Windows Update aside, I do use it and don’t want to uninstall it: as a web developer, it’s important for me to have cross-browser compatibility. So I irregularly need to use IE, Firefox, Chrome, and Opera (Safari from my Mac) so that my visitors will have the best experience I can offer.
Blah blah blah, I’m a Mozilla Executive (in other words, a dinosaur), Hear Me Roar…
Anderson also goes on about tie-ins to Microsoft apps, which is more of a problem with developers (that are not necessarily Microsoft employees) using stupidass code than Windows itself. If he did the research instead of mindlessly typing on his computer, pretending to know about computers (I guess he’s just an executive, just like people in Microsoft), he’d know that the “default browser” thing has been working quite well for the past year or so. Way before his blog post or the ballot thing.
Anderson talks about OEM policy towards the ballot screen. If OEMs (which are basically have highly specialized IT shops, and the first-in-line) can easily disable IE8, and IT can easily disable the ballot screen, how can you not figure out that OEMs can disable the ballot screen if they want to? Group Policy, my dear.
Oh, that’s right. Firefox has crap Enterprise and IT support, so it should make sense that an executive who’s company refuses to publish easily deployable MSI packages of Firefox that can be installed across hundreds of company computers simultaneously doesn’t know shit about real world practices. Now that’s stupid.
He also complains about people downloading but not installing Firefox, which is why the ballot screen should automatically install it. INSTAFAIL. That’s a security disaster waiting to happen, and he doesn’t even realize that he hasn’t packaged Firefox to do that. I don’t think FrontMotion is exactly an arm of Mozilla (it’s a MS Certified Partner), and it’s not that hard to shape an MSI around an installer.
Maybe he doesn’t realize that some people install Firefox multiple times. A billion downloads should equate to a billion users, yes? What? File sharing? Updates? Reformats? Dual-booting? Auto-downloaders? I can’t hear you.
So what is this? Because they now have momentum, the underdogs now have license to be stupid? If you want in on the game, play the game.
Why The Hell Do You Write Such Long Posts
Because trying to be witty in every single sentence and creating thought-terminating memes, cliches, and other shorter but inaccurate devices is kinda’ stupid. Sorry, I’m a bit old-school.
Perhaps my English teachers would be proud. Or maybe they aren’t.